I Guess I Could Get Used to Poutine

Fareed Zakaria just introduced me to another pair of interesting ideas: the ease with which I could legally live outside the United States, and the artificial hurdles the United States puts up to expanding our skilled and educated workforce.

When we lived in Germany in 2005, we had to come back from that great experience earlier than I would have liked because we couldn’t get long-term legal status.  We looked into the possibility of getting legal status in other European countries, but all of them built their requirements on close family connections.  While this makes some sense, it’s not really a system designed for the future economy, is it?

Of course, I’m lucky that I don’t have to worry about trying to get into the USA.  Our immigration policy is just a mess, I’m glad I don’t have to navigate it, and it’s not designed to build our economy, either.

And then there’s Canada.

As Zakaria writes, the Canadians just keep doing things right.  I guess it comes from the same wellspring of common sense that led them to be the only country “in the industrialized world (that) has not faced a single bank failure, calls for bailouts or government intervention in the financial or mortgage sectors.”  Here’s what Zakaria writes about Canada’s much more sensible immigration policy:

The U.S. currently has a brain-dead immigration system. We issue a small number of work visas and green cards, turning away from our shores thousands of talented students who want to stay and work here. Canada, by contrast, has no limit on the number of skilled migrants who can move to the country. They can apply on their own for a Canadian Skilled Worker Visa, which allows them to become perfectly legal “permanent residents” in Canada-no need for a sponsoring employer, or even a job. Visas are awarded based on education level, work experience, age and language abilities. If a prospective immigrant earns 67 points out of 100 total (holding a Ph.D. is worth 25 points, for instance), he or she can become a full-time, legal resident of Canada.

Doesn’t this just make sense?  I just took the test, and we could live in Canada.  Our combination of education, work experience, English language skills, and age puts us at 76 points on their scale.  So, we are eligible to move to Canada because we would help their economy.

This just makes sense.

Unfortunately for the United States, our policies are such that Microsoft had to open up a research facility in Vancouver, BC, to accommodate the skilled and educated workers from India and China who wanted to help us build our economy, but who we wouldn’t let in.  Why is this, exactly?

Advertisements

About Lance Finney

Father of two boys, Java developer, Ethical Humanist, and world traveler (when I can sneak it in). Contributor to Grounded Parents.
This entry was posted in Politics, Travel. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to I Guess I Could Get Used to Poutine

  1. Dan Lewis says:

    I took the quiz and we can go too…and we can get free health care to boot! Now the question is would we really -want- to live in Canada? Even Vancouver, probably the warmest spot in Canada is cloudy and rainy like Seattle. Maybe global warming will make it more attractive.

  2. Lance Finney says:

    True, it does leave the question open of whether one would want to move there. At this point, I don’t have a need to. However, it’s nice to know I have options.

    Vancouver would be nice, but so would Toronto, Quebec, Montreal, and I’m guessing parts of the maritime provinces. Of course, there is always the cold issue.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s